A conference is coming up July 16 – 20 in Victoria: World
Recreational Fishing Conference – 8. You may want to go. Learn more on the
Freshwater Fisheries Society of BC (FFS) website: http://www.wrfc8.com/#Section2. Everything
to do with the science of sport fishing can be had at the four-day meeting,
held every several years around the world. More than one hundred papers will be
presented over the four days.
Here is what the FFS says:
“The 8th World Recreational Fishing Conference is
returning to Canada for 2017. The conference unites the global recreational
fishing community - providing an essential forum to discuss current research.
Held every three years, this is the only international conference focused
solely on recreational fisheries. The host organization for the 2017
conference is the Freshwater Fisheries Society of BC, in cooperation with the
Sport Fishing Institute of BC.”
There are three symposia sessions and eight other
sessions, each of which may have as many as 20 presenters. The Poster display
is worth taking in as there are 38 to view, on subjects ranging from the length
of time out of water related to fish survival of released fish to Atlantic
salmon conservation for anglers, to billfish fishing in the tropics, to the
Sport Fishing Advisory Board in BC.
Presenters are from all over the world, covering
fishing issues from Australia to Russia. One subject of interest to me, is the
Gene Banking of Sperm, something I think is vital to retaining the genetic
diversity of the 9652 different strains of salmon in BC, and easier with sperm
than the much larger eggs. The poster PDF can be downloaded at: http://www.wrfc8.com/PDFs/WRFC/Abstracts-Poster-Session.aspx.
There are far more presentations than there is time
for, so I zeroed in on subjects of interest to me. Among them are the following:
Session
2: Citizen Science and Recreational Fisheries is your session
to learn more about taking part in BC science by taking readings while you are
out fishing. You can find out more at: http://www.wrfc8.com/PDFs/WRFC/Abstracts-Session-2-Citizen-Science-and-Recreation.aspx.
Brian Riddell, President and CEO of the Pacific Salmon Foundation (PSF) is the
chair for this session, and, of course the PSF does have anglers on the water
taking readings.
The Sport Fishing Institute has an app that allows for
real time uploading of angler information that allows DFO to make adjustments that
get to anglers and commercial fishers in quicker order than other approaches.
Session
3: Reconciling Stocking, Management and Conservation has
several items of interest. This session explores different applications of fish
stocking to support recreational fisheries for both marine and freshwater
situations around the world. Fisheries can be established and protected but at
the same time effects on existing species and strains of fish result, including
genetic ones.
Session
4: Management Strategies, Policy Development and Governance
is the one that most interests me, with more than 20 talks scheduled. In
Alberta, for instance, fisheries are structured differently from BC:
“E7: Alberta Conservation Association: A Case Study
of an Alternative Model for Fisheries Conservation and Management Activities.
As a
Delegated Administrative Organization under the Alberta Wildlife Act, Alberta
Conservation Association (ACA) is in a unique position to function both as an
arms-length research organization of provincial government, and a not-for-profit
conservation organization. Led by a Governance Board consisting of members of
major conservation groups within the province and a single government representative,
ACA receives direction from both public stakeholder groups and the provincial
government. The governance structure, funding model and mandate of ACA makes it
relatively unique in Canada and as such provides an interesting case study on
the pros and cons of undertaking fisheries conservation and management activities
in close relationship with, but separate from, government biologists and policy
makers.”
And in
Denmark, they have tried another alternative: E10: Resurging the Atlantic
Salmon Stocks in Denmark Through Adaptive Management.” They have focussed on
habitat restoration, something I think does not receive enough funding in BC,
and requires change of The Fisheries Act, particularly the HADD (harmful
alteration, disruption and destruction of fish habitat) provisions. The Harper
Conservatives got rid of it to favour business, and the current DFO Ottawa brass
is on record as saying they don’t want to go back to the previous status. BC
expects better than this.
Most of
us know Gerry Kristianson, long time PSC and SFAB participant. He speaks in
session E15. Here is what he says:
“It is
important that advocates of recreational fishing, public servants charged with
fisheries management,
and scientists and other experts who provide objective advice, all understand
the nature
and dimensions of fisheries politics. Accusing someone of “playing politics” is
usually intended
as a criticism, even an insult. But the phrase should be considered from a different perspective.
Politics is the social process by which differences are expressed and resolved.
If you don’t have differences, then you don’t have politics. A political
situation, whether it is in a family,
the workplace, government administration or a contest for public office is the
process through which differences are discussed and settled. Fisheries politics
takes place at a number of
different levels. At the domestic level it determines the resources available
to manage fisheries and understand their impacts. It defines the relationship
between conservation and extraction. It determines the allocation of harvest
between competing interests. At the international level it sets the rules
between nations for the conservation and sharing of migratory and straddling
stocks. Underlying
all of these political relationships are rules and norms of political behavior
that need to be learned and practiced by those who wish to maximize their influence
over how fisheries are managed and practised.”
Session 5
is: Engagement of Fishers in the Management Process. Here is
one on the difficulty of taking sport fishing data and making sense of it because
anglers don’t value the same things: “C8: Maximum Experiential Yield – A New
MEY Paradigm for Recreational Fisheries.” It examines the issue of science
destroying fisheries.
Session
6: Social and Economic Values of Recreational Fisheries. For
people like me - committed stats junkies - this one gives global stats on sport
fishing participation, value and trade offs. The upside is global data, for
example: “G2 Recreational Sea Angling and its Significance to the English
Economy.”
Here are some useful stats: “We show that recreational sea angling
supported just over £2bn of output and almost 24,000 jobs in England.” And there
are stats for other countries that also can be used for comparison purposes
across nations.
The downside is how differently the stats are put together in each
country and whether they match up with methods used elsewhere. Let me give you
an example. In Canada, I have the every-five-years series of recreational fishing
stats put out by Stats Canada since 1975.
Here is the problem: Stats from different sources aren’t the same. The
BC Stats report, which starts with Stats Can data, says that the ‘fishing
sectors’, sport/commercial/processing, contributes vastly more than aquaculture
to the province’s Gross Domestic Product. That report has a 20-page section on
caveats to using Stats Can data. Thus the numbers are vastly different from
DFO.
Here is one of my posts on the revenue: http://fishfarmnews.blogspot.ca/2015/05/salmonfishing-revenue-towers-over.html.
It says:
“The financial numbers were derived from several reports. We normally
say it is a billion for angling, but when I looked deeper into the reports, and
accounted for processing and commercial, updated for inflation, found separate
figures for fresh and salt angling, the figure came in much higher. Note that my
purpose was saying what the total value of salmon/fishing is to BC, not simply
sport revenue.”
You can go through my calculation at the above link. It came in at $2.52
billion, including all freshwater angling revenue, not simply salmon, updated
for inflation. If the Strait of Georgia PSF project delivers, you can add $200
million more, and that is their conservative figure."
By all means, go to the conference. If not, the pinks are in, and most
anyone can catch many salmon for dinner and enjoy the stats: a run of 13.3
million.
No comments:
Post a Comment